-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add transparent caching, --cache-create, --cache-delete and --cache-q… #155
Conversation
@bayasdev I installed akmod-nvidia from rpmfusion on my Fedora 39 install and tested all state transitions. All tests passing. I believe we are good to merge this now. Thanks for all the help! |
Thanks @klmcwhirter! I'll check this on the weekend but LGTM and works as expected on my Ubuntu 23.10 test machine. However, I don't think pushing a new release immediately after merging this, so we can see if anyone living on the edge pulls EnvyControl from main branch and reports an issue related to the cache system 😆 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
def create_cache_obj(self, nvidia_gpu_pci_bus):
from datetime import datetime
return {
'switch': {
'nvidia_gpu_pci_bus': nvidia_gpu_pci_bus
},
'metadata': {
'audit_iso_tmstmp': datetime.now().isoformat(),
'args': vars(self.app_args),
'amd_igpu_name': get_amd_igpu_name(),
'current_mode': self.current_mode,
'display_manager': get_display_manager(),
'igpu_pci_bus': get_igpu_bus_pci_bus(),
'igpu_vendor': get_igpu_vendor(),
}
}
We can cache only the nvidia_gpu_pci_bus
for now, major changes should be delayed for version 4. That would simplify a lot this PR.
It won't change much, but as promised earlier I will make the change here and in README.md. You see one of the most challenging aspects of troubleshooting a risky system change like this is having enough visibility into the information used by a process to make decisions. And, you can never predict which information might be needed given a particular scenario. It is best to have everything. Putting it all in the new cache file is the least risky approach - as opposed to, say, adding a set of rolling log files in /var/log/envycontrol/... Change made. I will puish it up once I have the README adjustments made and perform asnother round of testing. Here is what the cache file looks like now:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please update the object so it looks like this:
{
"nvidia_gpu_pci_bus_id": "PCI:1:0:0"
}
That will take more time and retesting. I will look at it tomorrow when I have more time. |
If the user does not provide enough system logs we can mark their issue as invalid.
Writing to syslog is a good idea for version 4, that would be much cleaner than caching user's system data that will eventually get stale. Edit: If you feel comfortable you can add a |
That will take more time and retesting. I will look at it tomorrow when I have more time. Oops - this was not posted yesterday. I went through the 6 switch operations and 6 reboots to test and I think it looks good. But, that is it. Take it or leave it. I won't be making any more changes and think the last 2 are a mistake. As mentioned I will be using the version from my tests branch. The reason is that I am only getting about 2-1/2 hr battery life in integrated mode. Which means I either need to find the magic bullet thatr is missing in the config mods, or accelerate the process of buying a laptop without nvidia hardware. FYI. Push is coming in a minute. This is what my test plan looks like.
All state transitions happened without issue. Enjoy! |
Thanks @klmcwhirter! this is exactly what I needed the cache to be. Will issue a new release in the following hours. |
Glad I could help. As mentioned, my tests branch will remain and I'll be adding more details to help troubleshoot to the cache file there. Feel free to borrow code as you would like from that branch. But to be honest, I probably will time box my effort there. I have 2 projects on hold while I have been working on this. One of them is my pi-day-2024-with-py project ;) |
…uery options
As mentioned elsewhere please DO NOT MERGE until a commit shows up with fixes 79 in it.TODO:* more testing* update README - https://github.com/klmcwhirter/envycontrol?tab=readme-ov-file#%EF%B8%8F-usage - what else?